So earlier today, I noted that LGF had been linked in the wikipedia references on the Reuters page:

LGF is now referenced on the Reuters wikipedia page:
[Link: en.wikipedia.org…]

In 2010, Reuters was criticised again for anti-Israeli bias when it cropped out a knife held by an activist in an image of an injured Israeli soldier from the photos covering the Gaza flotilla raid. [21] In two separate photographs, knives held by the activists were edited out of the pictures [22][23].

#22 ^ [Link: littlegreenfootballs.com…]
#23 ^ [Link: littlegreenfootballs.com…]

Unfortunately, the link has since been updated to link to Haaretz.com:

#21^ a b Mozgovaya, Natasha (8 June 2010). “Reuters under fire for removing weapons, blood from images of Gaza flotilla”. Haaretz. haaretz.com. Retrieved 8 June 2010.

Good for them for getting the link, but WTF. Why would someone change the original source of the story? Give credit where credit is due. If someone has a wikipedia account, please update the source for that…